LU vs. INTA
LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) and INTA (Intapp, Inc.) are both stocks. LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while INTA operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LU returned -22.60%/yr vs -20.80%/yr for INTA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LU vs. INTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LU having a -48.05% return and INTA slightly higher at -47.84%.
LU
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -32.14%
- YTD
- -48.05%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -54.45%
- 3Y*
- -22.60%
- 5Y*
- -40.59%
- 10Y*
- —
INTA
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 11.21%
- YTD
- -47.84%
- 6M
- -44.39%
- 1Y
- -57.18%
- 3Y*
- -20.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LU vs. INTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | -48.05% | 7.11% | 73.97% | -58.03% | -60.48% | -51.13% |
INTA Intapp, Inc. | -47.84% | -28.51% | 68.57% | 52.45% | -0.87% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LU and INTA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
LU:
CN¥31.92B
INTA:
$554.34M
LU:
CN¥13.50B
INTA:
$415.89M
LU:
-CN¥1.26B
INTA:
-$30.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LU vs. INTA — Risk / Return Rank
LU
INTA
LU vs. INTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Intapp, Inc. (INTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LU | INTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.88 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | -1.48 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LU vs. INTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, which is greater than INTA's maximum drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and INTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LU | INTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.68% | -74.17% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.77% | -64.89% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.77% | -74.17% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.42% | -67.75% | -27.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.39% | -31.21% | -47.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.81% | 39.95% | -1.14% |
Volatility
LU vs. INTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) is 11.70%, while Intapp, Inc. (INTA) has a volatility of 21.29%. This indicates that LU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LU | INTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.70% | 21.29% | -9.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.40% | 47.58% | -13.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.01% | 55.97% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.61% | 54.69% | +21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.27% | 54.69% | +21.58% |
Dividends
LU vs. INTA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LU nor INTA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTA Intapp, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 101.26% | 11.60% | 26.29% |
Financials
LU vs. INTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lufax Holding Ltd and Intapp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LU and INTA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTA has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to LU (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LU dropped -96.68% vs INTA's -74.17%.
INTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.02 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LU and INTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer