PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRN vs. GLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRN vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRN achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 1.47% return.


LTRN

1D
-9.09%
1M
52.47%
YTD
12.21%
6M
-3.95%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
-12.24%
5Y*
-25.86%
10Y*

GLTR

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
1.47%
6M
10.73%
1Y
53.06%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRN vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LTRN
Lantern Pharma Inc.
12.21%-5.02%-25.47%-29.14%-24.31%-58.55%28.76%
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
1.47%87.25%20.63%2.01%-0.25%-9.60%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRN and GLTR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRN vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRN
LTRN Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTR
GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRN vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTRNGLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

1.80

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

4.13

-3.98

LTRN vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRN and GLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTRNGLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

1.42

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.65

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.32

-0.58

Drawdowns

LTRN vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRN drawdown since its inception was -94.89%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRN and GLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRNGLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.89%

-55.70%

-39.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.95%

-29.70%

-49.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.48%

-29.70%

-59.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.02%

-29.70%

-63.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.49%

-26.86%

-57.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.20%

-28.83%

-37.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.12%

12.88%

+24.24%

Volatility

LTRN vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) has a higher volatility of 33.75% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 9.13%. This indicates that LTRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRNGLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.75%

9.13%

+24.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.61%

35.41%

+54.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.91%

37.58%

+59.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.34%

23.63%

+61.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.19%

20.50%

+64.69%

Dividends

LTRN vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTRN nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LTRN and GLTR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTRN has higher volatility (33.75%) compared to GLTR (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRN dropped -94.89% vs GLTR's -55.70%.

GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRN and GLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer