LTRN vs. GLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).

GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010.

Performance

LTRN vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LTRN vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LTRN Lantern Pharma Inc.	-54.79%	-5.02%	-25.47%	-29.14%	-24.31%	-58.55%	28.76%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	6.38%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	21.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRN achieves a -54.79% return, which is significantly lower than GLTR's 6.38% return.

LTRN

• 1D: 10.93%
• 1M: -51.42%
• YTD: -54.79%
• 6M: -68.51%
• 1Y: -61.30%
• 3Y*: -34.30%
• 5Y*: -41.44%
• 10Y*: —

GLTR

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: -14.74%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 32.20%
• 1Y: 68.93%
• 3Y*: 33.85%
• 5Y*: 18.37%
• 10Y*: 14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LTRN vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRN

LTRN Risk / Return Rank: 12
LTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 85
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRN vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTRN	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	1.87	-2.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	2.11	-2.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.36	-0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	2.38	-3.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.95	8.28	-10.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTRN vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRN and GLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTRN	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	1.87	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.50	0.80	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.34	-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between LTRN and GLTR is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LTRN vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTRN nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LTRN vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRN drawdown since its inception was -94.89%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRN and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTRN	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.89%	-55.70%	-39.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.95%	-29.70%	-49.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.37%	-29.70%	-64.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.75%	-23.32%	-70.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.53%	-28.89%	-36.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.41%	8.54%	+22.87%

Volatility

LTRN vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) has a higher volatility of 65.65% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 13.48%. This indicates that LTRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTRN	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	65.65%	13.48%	+52.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.15%	35.75%	+44.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.49%	37.11%	+55.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.20%	23.16%	+60.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.77%	20.28%	+63.49%