LTRN vs. GLTR
LTRN (Lantern Pharma Inc.) is a stock, while GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Over the past 5 years, LTRN returned -25.87%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LTRN vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTRN achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -13.81% return.
LTRN
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -25.58%
- 6M
- -17.09%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- -27.07%
- 3Y*
- -16.73%
- 5Y*
- -25.87%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -12.53%
- 6M
- -25.28%
- YTD
- -13.81%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
LTRN vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTRN Lantern Pharma Inc. | -3.96% | -5.02% | -25.47% | -29.14% | -24.31% | -58.55% | 30.07% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -13.81% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 19.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTRN and GLTR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTRN vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
LTRN
GLTR
LTRN vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTRN | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.66 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 1.44 | -2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTRN vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTRN drawdown since its inception was -94.89%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRN and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTRN | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.89% | -55.70% | -39.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.95% | -37.87% | -41.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.48% | -37.87% | -51.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.50% | -37.87% | -54.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.72% | -37.87% | -48.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.48% | -28.86% | -37.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.51% | 17.26% | +21.25% |
Volatility
LTRN vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) has a higher volatility of 28.31% compared to abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 8.71%. This indicates that LTRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTRN | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.31% | 8.71% | +19.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.53% | 35.38% | +57.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.59% | 39.35% | +60.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.26% | 24.10% | +62.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.33% | 20.77% | +64.56% |
Dividends
LTRN vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTRN nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LTRN and GLTR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTRN has higher volatility (28.31%) compared to GLTR (8.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRN dropped -94.89% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTRN and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer