PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRIX vs. SACAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRIX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than SACAX's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LTRIX has underperformed SACAX with an annualized return of 11.01%, while SACAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.


LTRIX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.28%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.08%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
11.01%

SACAX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.86%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.35%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.73%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-8.34%21.38%
SACAX
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio
11.70%16.56%24.20%21.42%-19.06%19.34%15.11%26.87%-9.13%21.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRIX and SACAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2008

0.99

The correlation between LTRIX and SACAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRIX vs. SACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SACAX
SACAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTRIXSACAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.92

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

13.07

-1.05

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SACAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRIX and SACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTRIXSACAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.22

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.77

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.48

0.00

Drawdowns

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRIX drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, smaller than the maximum SACAX drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRIX and SACAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRIXSACAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-54.31%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.85%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-15.88%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-26.96%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-34.90%

+3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-9.79%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.97%

-0.18%

Volatility

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) is 3.06%, while Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that LTRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SACAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRIXSACAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.34%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

9.29%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

11.60%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

15.63%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

16.05%

-1.23%

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTRIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SACAX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTRIX vs. SACAX - Dividend Comparison

LTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, less than SACAX's 10.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.56%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%
SACAX
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio
10.74%11.99%13.37%1.16%9.30%7.53%4.02%4.47%20.79%6.82%3.68%14.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LTRIX and SACAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SACAX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to LTRIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRIX dropped -51.39% vs SACAX's -54.31%.

SACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRIX and SACAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer