LTL vs. XTL
LTL (ProShares Ultra Telecommunications) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LTL returned 6.77%/yr vs 14.36%/yr for XTL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
LTL vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -11.55% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 36.50% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed XTL with an annualized return of 6.77%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.36% annualized return.
LTL
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -11.55%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 17.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
XTL
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- YTD
- 36.50%
- 1Y
- 76.86%
- 3Y*
- 42.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 14.36%
LTL vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications | -11.55% | 37.06% | 65.15% | 62.03% | -41.14% | 40.42% | -3.25% | 30.16% | -23.44% | -26.85% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 36.50% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTL and XTL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LTL and XTL has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LTL vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LTL
XTL
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
LTL
XTL
Technology
LTL
XTL
Basic Materials
LTL
-
XTL
-
Consumer Cyclical
LTL
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
LTL
-
XTL
-
Energy
LTL
-
XTL
-
Financial Services
LTL
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
LTL
-
XTL
-
Industrials
LTL
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
LTL
-
XTL
Utilities
LTL
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTL vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
LTL
XTL
LTL vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTL | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 4.88 | -4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 15.96 | -15.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTL vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTL | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.20% | -37.01% | -43.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.33% | -15.83% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.37% | -22.79% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.60% | -36.85% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.15% | -37.01% | -27.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.66% | -15.83% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -9.77% | -18.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 4.83% | +4.64% |
Volatility
LTL vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) at 8.54%. This indicates that LTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTL | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 8.54% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 24.10% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.99% | 31.01% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.86% | 25.56% | +9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.88% | 23.69% | +13.19% |
LTL vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTL vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than XTL's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications | 0.97% | 0.64% | 0.29% | 0.97% | 2.01% | 1.14% | 1.57% | 0.83% | 1.99% | 1.96% | 0.70% | 1.55% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 1.28% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTL and XTL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTL has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to XTL (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 14.36% vs 6.77% for LTL. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 8.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 14.36% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTL.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.97% for LTL.
LTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XTL is Communications Equities. LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTL and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer