PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. UCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTL vs. UCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than UCC's -8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed UCC with an annualized return of 8.83%, while UCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


LTL

1D
-1.02%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-12.79%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
34.49%
5Y*
15.81%
10Y*
8.83%

UCC

1D
0.57%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
-8.62%
6M
-10.29%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. UCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-12.79%37.06%65.15%62.03%-41.14%40.42%-3.25%30.16%-23.44%-26.85%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
-8.62%2.21%44.24%61.67%-57.59%20.92%46.55%53.76%-4.94%42.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and UCC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008

0.55

The correlation between LTL and UCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. UCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UCC
UCC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. UCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTLUCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.35

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

0.97

+0.32

LTL vs. UCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the UCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and UCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTL vs. UCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, roughly equal to the maximum UCC drawdown of -83.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and UCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLUCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-83.05%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-29.14%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

-48.01%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

-61.77%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

-61.77%

-2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.86%

-18.41%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-21.80%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

10.45%

-2.76%

Volatility

LTL vs. UCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 7.29%, while ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTLUCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

12.41%

-5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

27.05%

-7.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

36.41%

-9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.58%

43.70%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.91%

40.68%

-3.77%

LTL vs. UCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTL and UCC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

LTL vs. UCC - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than UCC's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.93%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
1.18%1.10%0.17%0.04%0.25%0.00%0.02%0.17%0.18%0.14%0.21%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTL and UCC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCC has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to LTL (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs UCC's -83.05%.

On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 13.99% vs 8.83% for LTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, LTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTL and UCC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.93% for LTL.

LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%).

LTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTL and UCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer