PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. CURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTL vs. CURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than CURE's -7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed CURE with an annualized return of 8.83%, while CURE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.


LTL

1D
-1.02%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-12.79%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
34.49%
5Y*
15.81%
10Y*
8.83%

CURE

1D
-0.55%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-7.96%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. CURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-12.79%37.06%65.15%62.03%-41.14%40.42%-3.25%30.16%-23.44%-26.85%
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-7.96%22.55%-8.47%-9.40%-20.51%88.30%5.02%55.66%2.82%69.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and CURE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011

0.39

The correlation between LTL and CURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LTL vs. CURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LTL
CURE

Communication Services

57.5%

-

Technology

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

LTL
57.5%
CURE

-

Technology

LTL
2.8%
CURE

-

Basic Materials

LTL

-

CURE

-

Consumer Cyclical

LTL

-

CURE

-

Consumer Defensive

LTL

-

CURE

-

Energy

LTL

-

CURE

-

Financial Services

LTL

-

CURE

-

Healthcare

LTL

-

CURE
100.0%

Industrials

LTL

-

CURE

-

Real Estate

LTL

-

CURE

-

Utilities

LTL

-

CURE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. CURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. CURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTLCUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.85

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

1.94

-0.65

LTL vs. CURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the CURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and CURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTL vs. CURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than CURE's maximum drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and CURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLCUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-69.19%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-31.10%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

-51.93%

+17.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

-52.23%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

-69.19%

+5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.86%

-26.94%

+11.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-18.16%

-10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

13.71%

-6.02%

Volatility

LTL vs. CURE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 7.29%, while Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a volatility of 14.30%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTLCUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

14.30%

-7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

30.87%

-11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

44.32%

-17.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.58%

43.84%

-9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.91%

49.59%

-12.68%

LTL vs. CURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CURE's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTL vs. CURE - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CURE's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.16%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%0.00%0.00%
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.93%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTL and CURE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURE has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to LTL (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs CURE's -69.19%.

On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs 8.83% for LTL. On fees, LTL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.

CURE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.93% for LTL.

LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 1.08% for CURE.

CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTL and CURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer