PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSSAX vs. LSSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSAX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than LSSCX's 14.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSAX has underperformed LSSCX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while LSSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.63% annualized return.


LSSAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.35%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
2.51%

LSSCX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
14.10%
6M
13.75%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
1.11%8.32%3.94%7.01%-11.82%0.64%4.68%6.81%2.48%3.40%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.10%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSAX and LSSCX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2006

-0.09

The correlation between LSSAX and LSSCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSSAX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSSAX
LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSSAXLSSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

3.12

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

9.61

+3.87

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the LSSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSAX and LSSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSSAXLSSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.78

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.39

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.44

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.58

+0.37

Drawdowns

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSAX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum LSSCX drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSAX and LSSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSSAXLSSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-54.28%

+37.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

-9.89%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.91%

-25.10%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.40%

-25.10%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.40%

-44.65%

+28.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.55%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-7.58%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

3.90%

-3.00%

Volatility

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) is 1.42%, while Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that LSSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSSAXLSSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

4.47%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

12.99%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

17.43%

-13.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

20.91%

-15.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

22.42%

-18.01%

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSSAX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison

LSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than LSSCX's 15.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
4.34%4.23%4.54%5.65%6.47%6.38%5.95%5.48%5.62%5.42%5.12%5.20%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
15.33%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSSAX and LSSCX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSCX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to LSSAX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSAX dropped -16.40% vs LSSCX's -54.28%.

LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSSAX and LSSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer