LSSAX vs. VCSH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LSSAX (Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund) and VCSH (Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both funds - LSSAX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Loomis Sayles, while VCSH is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, LSSAX returned 2.36%/yr vs 2.64%/yr for VCSH. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LSSAX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCSH.

Performance

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSSAX having a 0.81% return and VCSH slightly lower at 0.79%. Over the past 10 years, LSSAX has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 2.36%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.64% annualized return.

LSSAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 0.30%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: 2.36%
• ALL TIME*: 3.92%

VCSH

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 1Y: 3.07%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: 2.30%
• 10Y*: 2.64%
• ALL TIME*: 2.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF	$304.83M	$291.45M	$343.43M

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	0.81%	8.32%	3.94%	7.01%	-11.82%	0.64%	4.68%	6.81%	2.48%	3.40%
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.79%	6.77%	4.91%	6.20%	-5.62%	-0.63%	5.13%	7.02%	0.92%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSAX and VCSH is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009	0.67

The correlation between LSSAX and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSSAX vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSSAX

LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VCSH

VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 81
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSSAX	VCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.89	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.84	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.61	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	10.26	-2.13

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSAX and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSAX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSAX and VCSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSSAX	VCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.40%	-12.86%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.16%	-1.40%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.09%	-1.40%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.31%	-9.48%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.40%	-12.86%	-3.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-0.29%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-0.96%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.36%	+0.31%

Volatility

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.55%. This indicates that LSSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSSAX	VCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	0.55%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	1.56%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99%	1.94%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.83%	2.90%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.44%	3.35%	+1.09%

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

LSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than VCSH's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	4.38%	4.23%	4.54%	5.65%	6.47%	6.38%	5.95%	5.48%	5.62%	5.42%	5.12%	5.20%
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF	4.08%	4.35%	3.96%	3.09%	2.01%	1.81%	2.27%	2.87%	2.65%	2.26%	2.10%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSSAX and VCSH in my portfolio?

LSSAX and VCSH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSSAX or VCSH?

LSSAX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to VCSH (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSAX dropped -16.40% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.