PortfoliosLab logo
LSSAX vs. VCSH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LSSAX and VCSH is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LSSAX:

1.56

VCSH:

2.91

Sortino Ratio

LSSAX:

2.00

VCSH:

4.23

Omega Ratio

LSSAX:

1.23

VCSH:

1.59

Calmar Ratio

LSSAX:

0.85

VCSH:

5.35

Martin Ratio

LSSAX:

4.30

VCSH:

14.92

Ulcer Index

LSSAX:

1.63%

VCSH:

0.46%

Daily Std Dev

LSSAX:

5.25%

VCSH:

2.45%

Max Drawdown

LSSAX:

-16.39%

VCSH:

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

LSSAX:

-1.93%

VCSH:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSAX achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSAX has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 2.19%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.49% annualized return.


LSSAX

YTD

2.42%

1M

-1.18%

6M

1.48%

1Y

8.14%

3Y*

2.51%

5Y*

0.94%

10Y*

2.19%

VCSH

YTD

2.66%

1M

0.13%

6M

2.73%

1Y

7.09%

3Y*

3.98%

5Y*

1.99%

10Y*

2.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSSAX vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSSAX vs. VCSH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSSAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSSAX is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSSAX is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSSAX is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSSAX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSSAX is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSSAX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VCSH is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LSSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSAX and VCSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

LSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than VCSH's 4.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
4.40%4.55%5.65%6.48%6.40%5.96%5.50%5.63%5.41%5.13%5.21%4.95%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.11%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.25%2.10%2.08%2.01%

Drawdowns

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSAX drawdown since its inception was -16.39%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSAX and VCSH.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LSSAX vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.69%. This indicates that LSSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...