LSSAX vs. BUFHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX).
LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006. BUFHX is managed by Buffalo. It was launched on May 19, 1995.
Performance
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.29% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% | 3.40% |
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund | -0.57% | 5.11% | 10.35% | 11.68% | -5.53% | 5.52% | 9.26% | 12.33% | -2.26% | 5.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSSAX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than BUFHX's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSAX has underperformed BUFHX with an annualized return of 2.53%, while BUFHX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.35% annualized return.
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
BUFHX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSSAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFHX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSSAX vs. BUFHX — Risk / Return Rank
LSSAX
BUFHX
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSSAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.22 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.49 | 1.59 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.22 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 5.08 | +4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSSAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.22 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 1.53 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 1.33 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.51 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSSAX and BUFHX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Dividend Comparison
LSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than BUFHX's 7.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 4.28% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund | 7.12% | 6.84% | 8.03% | 6.41% | 8.05% | 7.24% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 5.17% | 4.57% | 3.85% | 5.51% |
Drawdowns
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSSAX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum BUFHX drawdown of -26.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSAX and BUFHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSSAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -26.01% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | -3.00% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.40% | -9.98% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.40% | -18.74% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -1.84% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -2.04% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.72% | +0.12% |
Volatility
LSSAX vs. BUFHX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSSAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.27% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 1.89% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 3.19% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 3.13% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 4.04% | +0.35% |