PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSGR vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSGR vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGR achieves a -7.28% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 49.84% return.


LSGR

1D
-0.17%
1M
-7.72%
YTD
-7.28%
6M
-8.65%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-4.72%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
49.84%
6M
38.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGR vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LSGR
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
-7.28%0.86%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
49.84%-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGR and MEME is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.46

LSGR vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LSGR
MEME

Technology

33.9%
66.7%

Communication Services

26.8%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

17.7%

-

Healthcare

8.0%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Financial Services

4.6%
5.5%

Industrials

4.0%
22.3%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Energy

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.9%

Technology

LSGR
33.9%
MEME
66.7%

Communication Services

LSGR
26.8%
MEME
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

LSGR
17.7%
MEME

-

Healthcare

LSGR
8.0%
MEME
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

LSGR
5.0%
MEME

-

Financial Services

LSGR
4.6%
MEME
5.5%

Industrials

LSGR
4.0%
MEME
22.3%

Basic Materials

LSGR

-

MEME
4.6%

Energy

LSGR

-

MEME
4.8%

Real Estate

LSGR

-

MEME

-

Utilities

LSGR

-

MEME
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSGR vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGR
LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGR vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSGRMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

LSGR vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSGR vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGR drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGR and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSGRMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-48.78%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.21%

-21.27%

+11.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-28.59%

+24.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.92%

Volatility

LSGR vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSGRMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

75.53%

-58.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

75.53%

-55.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

75.53%

-55.06%

LSGR vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSGR vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSGR nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
LSGR
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
0.00%0.05%0.08%0.03%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSGR and MEME have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSGR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSGR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

LSGR and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LSGR and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSGR and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer