LSGR vs. CGGR

In the year-to-date period, LSGR achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than CGGR's 2.66% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LSGR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LSGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGR and CGGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LSGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CGGR's 0.32% yield.

The maximum LSGR drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum CGGR drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGR and CGGR.

Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) at 5.54%. This indicates that LSGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.