LSGR vs. CCOR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LSGR returned 19.80%/yr vs -1.09%/yr for CCOR. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LSGR charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

LSGR vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGR achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's 1.03% return.

LSGR

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 0.69%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.28%

CCOR

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: -2.83%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 1Y: -0.49%
• 3Y*: -1.09%
• 5Y*: -1.48%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$60.78K	$57.90K	$78.59K
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	$2.50M	$2.85M	$2.95M

LSGR vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	-1.39%	15.32%	38.52%	12.46%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.03%	3.52%	-5.70%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGR and CCOR is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	-0.20

LSGR vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSGR	CCOR
Technology	32.1%	15.7%
Communication Services	26.8%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	9.1%
Healthcare	9.8%	12.2%
Financial Services	5.4%	18.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.9%
Industrials	4.2%	9.4%
Basic Materials	-	4.9%
Energy	-	6.4%
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	6.3%

Return for Risk

LSGR vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSGR

LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 17
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 10
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSGR vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSGR	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	-0.06	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	-0.03	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.00	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	-0.06	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.83	-0.12	+0.94

LSGR vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGR and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSGR vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGR drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGR and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGR	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	-22.99%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.13%	-8.79%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	-12.31%	-10.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.50%	-16.09%	+11.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-7.47%	+3.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.52%	4.19%	+2.33%

Volatility

LSGR vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.00%. This indicates that LSGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSGR	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	3.00%	+3.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	6.47%	+8.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	8.24%	+9.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.54%	11.19%	+9.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.54%	10.78%	+9.76%

LSGR vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSGR vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

LSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.99%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.05%	0.08%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSGR and CCOR in my portfolio?

LSGR and CCOR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSGR or CCOR?

LSGR has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to CCOR (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGR dropped -22.92% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, LSGR or CCOR?

On 3-year performance, LSGR leads with 19.80% vs -1.09% for CCOR. On fees, LSGR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSGR or CCOR?

Over the 3-year period, LSGR has performed better with a 19.80% return vs -1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSGR or CCOR?

LSGR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSGR or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for LSGR.

What is the main difference between LSGR and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LSGR and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.