LSF vs. NXL
LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) and NXL (Nexalin Technology Inc.) are both stocks. LSF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while NXL operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, LSF returned 75.15%/yr vs -26.31%/yr for NXL. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LSF vs. NXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 100.90% return, which is significantly higher than NXL's -35.47% return.
LSF
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 24.93%
- YTD
- 100.90%
- 6M
- 106.48%
- 1Y
- -28.75%
- 3Y*
- 75.15%
- 5Y*
- -30.85%
- 10Y*
- —
NXL
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -35.47%
- 6M
- -49.99%
- 1Y
- -65.70%
- 3Y*
- -26.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSF vs. NXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc. | 100.90% | -71.83% | 765.93% | 8.33% | -63.48% |
NXL Nexalin Technology Inc. | -35.47% | -79.78% | 581.82% | -45.95% | -72.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSF and NXL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
LSF:
$51.77M
NXL:
$7.14M
LSF:
-$1.00
NXL:
-$0.46
LSF:
1.50
NXL:
23.51
LSF:
$32.12M
NXL:
$275.58K
LSF:
$18.64M
NXL:
-$950.31K
LSF:
-$6.81M
NXL:
-$8.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSF vs. NXL — Risk / Return Rank
LSF
NXL
LSF vs. NXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Nexalin Technology Inc. (NXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSF | NXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.80 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | -1.16 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSF vs. NXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than NXL's maximum drawdown of -92.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and NXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSF | NXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.88% | -92.64% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.99% | -82.74% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.90% | -92.64% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.29% | -91.74% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -66.41% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.88% | 56.82% | -5.94% |
Volatility
LSF vs. NXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) is 22.51%, while Nexalin Technology Inc. (NXL) has a volatility of 36.70%. This indicates that LSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSF | NXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.51% | 36.70% | -14.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.19% | 73.33% | -13.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.03% | 145.37% | -64.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.27% | 165.42% | -61.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.46% | 165.42% | -63.96% |
Dividends
LSF vs. NXL - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSF nor NXL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSF vs. NXL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laird Superfood, Inc. and Nexalin Technology Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LSF and NXL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXL has higher volatility (36.70%) compared to LSF (22.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs NXL's -92.64%.
LSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSF and NXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer