LSAT vs. RMME

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) and RMME (Rareview Government Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSAT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RMME.

Performance

LSAT vs. RMME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than RMME's 1.37% return.

LSAT

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 9.61%
• 1Y: 10.81%
• 3Y*: 11.89%
• 5Y*: 6.09%
• 10Y*: —

RMME

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSAT vs. RMME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	10.77%	-1.05%
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF	1.37%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LSAT and RMME is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

LSAT vs. RMME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSAT

LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 25
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSAT vs. RMME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSAT	RMME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSAT	RMME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	8.27	-7.53

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. RMME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than RMME's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and RMME.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSAT	RMME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.48%	-0.17%	-20.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-0.00%	-5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LSAT	RMME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	0.41%	+12.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.25%	0.41%	+15.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.76%	0.41%	+16.35%

LSAT vs. RMME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RMME's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSAT vs. RMME - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than RMME's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.71%	1.90%	1.31%	1.85%	0.36%	3.44%	0.30%
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF	1.61%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSAT and RMME in my portfolio?

LSAT and RMME have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSAT or RMME?

On fees, RMME is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSAT or RMME?

RMME is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSAT or RMME?

LSAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.61% for RMME.

What is the main difference between LSAT and RMME?

They also come from different issuers: Redwood and Rareview. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LSAT and 0.30% for RMME.