LSAT vs. RMME
LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) and RMME (Rareview Government Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. LSAT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RMME.
Performance
LSAT vs. RMME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than RMME's 1.76% return.
LSAT
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
RMME
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSAT vs. RMME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 16.37% | -1.43% |
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF | 1.76% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSAT and RMME is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSAT vs. RMME — Risk / Return Rank
LSAT
RMME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LSAT vs. RMME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSAT | RMME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSAT vs. RMME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than RMME's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and RMME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSAT | RMME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -0.17% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | 0.00% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -0.00% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility
LSAT vs. RMME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSAT | RMME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 0.42% | +12.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 0.42% | +15.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 0.42% | +16.31% |
LSAT vs. RMME - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RMME's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSAT vs. RMME - Dividend Comparison
LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than RMME's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.63% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.30% |
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF | 1.89% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSAT and RMME have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMME is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMME is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.
RMME has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.63% for LSAT.
They also come from different issuers: Redwood and Rareview. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LSAT and 0.30% for RMME.
Find the right allocation for LSAT and RMME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer