LRGG vs. GQGU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LRGG (Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LRGG returned -1.41% vs 4.92% for GQGU. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. LRGG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.

Performance

LRGG vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGG achieves a -3.89% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 6.11% return.

LRGG

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 3.87%
• 6M: -4.31%
• YTD: -3.89%
• 1Y: -1.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 6.11%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 1Y: 4.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGG vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF	-3.89%	2.58%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	6.11%	-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGG and GQGU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

LRGG vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGG

LRGG Risk / Return Rank: 8
LRGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LRGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LRGG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LRGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LRGG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GQGU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGG vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRGG	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	—	—

Drawdowns

LRGG vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGG drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGG and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGG	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.94%	-8.41%	-10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.94%	-8.41%	-10.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-5.09%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-2.88%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRGG	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.54%	10.74%	+3.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.71%	10.74%	+5.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.71%	10.74%	+5.97%

LRGG vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGG vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

LRGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.96%	1.02%	0.00%
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF	0.16%	0.16%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGG and GQGU in my portfolio?

LRGG and GQGU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRGG or GQGU?

On 1-year performance, GQGU leads with 4.92% vs -1.41% for LRGG. On fees, LRGG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGG or GQGU?

Over the 1-year period, GQGU has performed better with a 4.92% return vs -1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGG or GQGU?

LRGG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGG or GQGU?

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.16% for LRGG.

What is the main difference between LRGG and GQGU?

They also come from different issuers: Nomura and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LRGG and 0.49% for GQGU.