LRGF vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LRGF is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LRGF returned 14.20%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRGF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

LRGF vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.24% return.

LRGF

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 6.67%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 26.79%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: 14.20%
• 10Y*: 14.11%

PSCX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 5.24%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 16.09%
• 3Y*: 12.89%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	11.29%	16.48%	26.59%	25.85%	-14.77%	25.01%	0.98%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.24%	12.08%	13.27%	16.57%	-7.35%	9.03%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and PSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020	0.89

The correlation between LRGF and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRGF vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGF	PSCX
Technology	35.6%	33.2%
Financial Services	12.5%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	10.0%
Healthcare	9.1%	9.6%
Communication Services	8.2%	10.3%
Industrials	8.1%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	5.4%
Energy	3.7%	4.2%
Utilities	2.3%	2.6%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.0%

Return for Risk

LRGF vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF

LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 65
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGF	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.92	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	4.38	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.60	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.95	-0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	20.26	-7.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGF vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGF	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.92	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	1.21	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.28	-0.58

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGF	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-10.20%	-25.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-4.20%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	-9.61%	-9.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-10.20%	-11.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-1.87%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	0.82%	+1.32%

Volatility

LRGF vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.92%. This indicates that LRGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGF	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	0.92%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	4.21%	+4.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	5.54%	+6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.02%	7.07%	+9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	6.97%	+11.34%

LRGF vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGF vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	1.05%	1.16%	1.23%	1.49%	1.78%	1.05%	1.35%	1.76%	3.27%	1.68%	1.56%	0.83%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGF and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, LRGF and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LRGF or PSCX?

LRGF has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to PSCX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, LRGF or PSCX?

On 5-year performance, LRGF leads with 14.20% vs 8.51% for PSCX. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGF or PSCX?

Over the 5-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGF or PSCX?

LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGF or PSCX?

LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between LRGF and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.