LRGF vs. PSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX).
LRGF and PSCX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 30, 2015. PSCX is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020.
Performance
LRGF vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRGF vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | -4.09% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 25.85% | -14.77% | 25.01% | 0.98% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | -1.88% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a -4.09% return, which is significantly lower than PSCX's -1.88% return.
LRGF
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 6M
- -3.47%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
PSCX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRGF vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRGF vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
LRGF
PSCX
LRGF vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGF | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.37 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.05 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.99 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 10.21 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGF | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.37 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.04 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.10 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGF and PSCX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LRGF vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.22% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LRGF vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and PSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGF | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -10.20% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -6.15% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -10.20% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.66% | -2.84% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -1.92% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.20% | +1.57% |
Volatility
LRGF vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 2.81%. This indicates that LRGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRGF | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 2.81% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 4.31% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 8.83% | +9.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 7.06% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 7.02% | +11.28% |