PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRGE vs. IYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRGE vs. IYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 19.29% return.


LRGE

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.67%
6M
2.18%
YTD
1.70%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.72%

IYW

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.23%
6M
20.08%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
28.25%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
24.38%
ALL TIME*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$125.49M$126.55M$189.91M
$4.11M$3.64M$1.94M

LRGE vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
1.70%9.54%26.32%46.36%-31.45%22.93%31.89%33.38%-0.38%16.01%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
19.29%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-0.93%14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGE and IYW is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.86

The correlation between LRGE and IYW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRGE vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LRGE
LRGE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LRGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LRGE vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRGEIYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.77

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

5.23

-4.37

LRGE vs. IYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the IYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGE and IYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRGE vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and IYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRGEIYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-81.90%

+44.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.32%

-17.81%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.26%

-26.47%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.03%

-39.44%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-8.40%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-34.48%

+27.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

6.03%

-0.24%

Volatility

LRGE vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is 5.54%, while iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that LRGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRGEIYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

7.86%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

19.90%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

23.79%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

26.47%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

25.36%

-4.74%

LRGE vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRGE vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison

LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than IYW's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
0.12%0.13%0.18%0.11%2.02%1.20%0.37%0.37%2.10%0.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRGE and IYW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYW has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to LRGE (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGE dropped -37.03% vs IYW's -81.90%.

On 5-year performance, IYW leads with 18.55% vs 8.75% for LRGE. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, LRGE has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IYW has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LRGE.

LRGE and IYW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.12%.

LRGE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IYW is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.38% for IYW.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRGE and IYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer