LRGE vs. GARY
LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRGE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
LRGE vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.03% return.
LRGE
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 9.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- —
GARY
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- YTD
- 30.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRGE vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 4.94% | 0.47% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 30.03% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and GARY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGE vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank
LRGE
GARY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LRGE vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRGE | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGE | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -10.28% | -26.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -5.23% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -1.87% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | — | — |
Volatility
LRGE vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGE | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 21.84% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 21.84% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 21.84% | -1.22% |
LRGE vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRGE vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRGE and GARY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRGE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRGE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
LRGE has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for LRGE and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer