PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRGC vs. TRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LRGC vs. TRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LRGC vs. TRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
-5.45%16.23%24.92%9.30%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
-1.81%6.03%11.97%5.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than TRND's -1.81% return.


LRGC

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-5.45%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRND

1D
1.95%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
0.62%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LRGC vs. TRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than TRND's 0.77% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LRGC vs. TRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC
LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TRND
TRND Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. TRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRGCTRNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.48

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

0.71

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.09

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.63

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.56

2.03

+3.53

LRGC vs. TRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the TRND Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGC and TRND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRGCTRNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.48

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.51

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and TRND is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LRGC vs. TRND - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than TRND's 2.36% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
0.61%0.58%0.46%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
2.36%2.32%2.31%2.51%1.76%0.93%0.60%0.93%

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. TRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than TRND's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and TRND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LRGCTRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-17.88%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-8.00%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.41%

-6.21%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-5.32%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.48%

+0.40%

Volatility

LRGC vs. TRND - Volatility Comparison

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LRGCTRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.21%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

8.73%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

10.80%

+7.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

9.53%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

11.13%

+4.29%