LRCX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 48.23%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for VT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

LRCX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 48.23%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.93% annualized return.

LRCX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 28.83%
• YTD: 114.54%
• 6M: 128.79%
• 1Y: 312.75%
• 3Y*: 81.91%
• 5Y*: 43.22%
• 10Y*: 48.23%

VT

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	114.54%	139.16%	-6.84%	88.63%	-40.72%	53.66%	64.18%	119.33%	-24.40%	76.21%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.06%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and VT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.64

The correlation between LRCX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LRCX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX

LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 68
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRCX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.79	1.94	+3.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.75	2.67	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.35	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.26	2.68	+12.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	51.20	11.67	+39.53

LRCX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.79, which is higher than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.90%	-50.27%	-37.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.01%	-9.67%	-10.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.10%	-16.51%	-30.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.39%	-26.38%	-30.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.39%	-34.24%	-22.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.92%	+1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.17%	-7.01%	-21.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.95%	2.22%	+3.73%

Volatility

LRCX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.26%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRCX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.52%	5.26%	+16.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.63%	11.01%	+32.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.78%	13.38%	+39.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.57%	16.15%	+30.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.92%	17.27%	+27.65%

Dividends

LRCX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	0.28%	0.57%	1.19%	0.95%	1.53%	0.78%	1.04%	1.54%	2.79%	1.01%	1.28%	1.36%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCX and VT in my portfolio?

LRCX and VT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRCX or VT?

LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.