PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. SOBO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LRCX is traded in USD, while SOBO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SOBO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than SOBO.TO's 40.32% return.


LRCX

1D
1.18%
1M
24.16%
YTD
114.54%
6M
128.79%
1Y
303.12%
3Y*
81.91%
5Y*
43.22%
10Y*
48.23%

SOBO.TO

1D
0.96%
1M
5.83%
YTD
40.32%
6M
44.41%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
114.54%139.16%-8.41%
SOBO.TO
South Bow Corp
40.32%25.61%15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and SOBO.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$463.20B

SOBO.TO:

CA$11.12B

EPS

LRCX:

$5.29

SOBO.TO:

$2.03

PE Ratio

LRCX:

69.37

SOBO.TO:

18.81

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

5.25

SOBO.TO:

3.47

PS Ratio

LRCX:

21.46

SOBO.TO:

4.37

PB Ratio

LRCX:

43.76

SOBO.TO:

2.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$21.68B

SOBO.TO:

$1.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$10.84B

SOBO.TO:

$893.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$6.10B

SOBO.TO:

$851.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SOBO.TO
SOBO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRCXSOBO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.41

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.26

3.99

+11.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

51.20

11.40

+39.79

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.79, which is higher than the SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and SOBO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than SOBO.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and SOBO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCXSOBO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.90%

-27.09%

-60.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.01%

-12.68%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.17%

-4.27%

-23.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

4.44%

+1.51%

Volatility

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO) at 7.09%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOBO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCXSOBO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.52%

7.09%

+14.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.63%

14.83%

+28.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.78%

20.21%

+32.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.57%

44.59%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.92%

44.59%

+0.33%

Dividends

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SOBO.TO's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.28%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
SOBO.TO
South Bow Corp
5.18%7.37%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and South Bow Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.84B
416.07M
(LRCX) Total Revenue
(SOBO.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRCX vs. SOBO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and South Bow Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
49.8%
22.0%
Portfolio components
LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

SOBO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported a gross profit of 91.48M and revenue of 416.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

SOBO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported an operating income of 91.48M and revenue of 416.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.

SOBO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported a net income of 75.74M and revenue of 416.07M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRCX and SOBO.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCX and SOBO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer