PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. SMSN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly lower than SMSN.L's 161.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed SMSN.L with an annualized return of 48.23%, while SMSN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 27.99% annualized return.


LRCX

1D
1.18%
1M
24.16%
YTD
114.54%
6M
128.79%
1Y
303.12%
3Y*
81.91%
5Y*
43.22%
10Y*
48.23%

SMSN.L

1D
6.51%
1M
13.49%
YTD
161.93%
6M
204.19%
1Y
399.27%
3Y*
59.18%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
27.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
114.54%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%119.33%-24.40%76.21%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
161.93%130.81%-37.94%38.34%-31.32%-8.01%60.01%41.56%-25.35%62.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and SMSN.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2006

0.25

Over the past year, LRCX and SMSN.L have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$463.20B

SMSN.L:

$1.46T

EPS

LRCX:

$5.29

SMSN.L:

₩320.04K

PE Ratio

LRCX:

69.37

SMSN.L:

25.63

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

5.25

SMSN.L:

0.77

PS Ratio

LRCX:

21.46

SMSN.L:

5.67

PB Ratio

LRCX:

43.76

SMSN.L:

4.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$21.68B

SMSN.L:

₩389.99T

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$10.84B

SMSN.L:

₩152.35T

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$6.10B

SMSN.L:

₩68.67T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCX vs. SMSN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SMSN.L
SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRCXSMSN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.75

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.26

18.03

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

51.20

57.94

-6.74

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.79, which is comparable to the SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and SMSN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than SMSN.L's maximum drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and SMSN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCXSMSN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.90%

-55.59%

-32.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.01%

-21.96%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

-44.52%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

-49.12%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

-54.44%

-1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.55%

+8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.17%

-17.37%

-10.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

6.85%

-0.90%

Volatility

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) have volatilities of 21.52% and 20.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCXSMSN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.52%

20.71%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.63%

43.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.78%

51.06%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.57%

34.83%

+11.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.92%

32.95%

+11.97%

Dividends

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SMSN.L's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.28%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
0.35%0.94%2.88%1.79%2.50%1.85%3.60%2.47%3.65%1.62%1.68%1.71%

Financials

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00T40.00T60.00T80.00T100.00T120.00T140.00T20222023202420252026
5.84B
133.87T
(LRCX) Total Revenue
(SMSN.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LRCX values in USD, SMSN.L values in KRW

LRCX vs. SMSN.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
49.8%
61.2%
Portfolio components
LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

SMSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

SMSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.

SMSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRCX and SMSN.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCX and SMSN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer