SMSN.L vs. CX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX).

Performance

SMSN.L vs. CX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMSN.L vs. CX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd	37.27%	130.81%	-37.94%	38.34%	-31.32%	-8.01%	60.01%	41.56%	-25.35%	63.26%
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	1.08%	105.97%	-26.48%	91.36%	-40.27%	31.14%	36.77%	-19.55%	-35.73%	-2.86%

Fundamentals

EPS SMSN.L : $169.44K CX : $0.99
PE Ratio SMSN.L : 0.02 CX : 11.76
PEG Ratio SMSN.L : 0.00 CX : 0.03
PS Ratio SMSN.L : 0.00 CX : 0.70
Total Revenue (TTM) SMSN.L : $335.26T CX : $16.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) SMSN.L : $98.56T CX : $5.08B
EBITDA (TTM) SMSN.L : $27.90T CX : $1.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 37.27% return, which is significantly higher than CX's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has outperformed CX with an annualized return of 20.58%, while CX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.13% annualized return.

SMSN.L

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -22.13%
• YTD: 37.27%
• 6M: 89.83%
• 1Y: 194.46%
• 3Y*: 34.50%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 20.58%

CX

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 30.90%
• 1Y: 105.30%
• 3Y*: 28.97%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SMSN.L vs. CX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSN.L

SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 98
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CX

CX Risk / Return Rank: 94
CX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSN.L vs. CX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMSN.L	CX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.65	3.01	+1.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.56	3.53	+1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.46	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.45	4.53	+3.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	29.22	17.36	+11.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMSN.L vs. CX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.65, which is higher than the CX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSN.L and CX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMSN.L	CX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.65	3.01	+1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.29	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.14	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.13	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SMSN.L and CX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SMSN.L vs. CX - Dividend Comparison

SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CX's 0.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd	0.45%	0.94%	2.88%	1.79%	2.50%	1.85%	3.60%	2.47%	3.65%	1.62%	1.68%	1.71%
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	0.77%	0.76%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SMSN.L vs. CX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -65.23%, smaller than the maximum CX drawdown of -92.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and CX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMSN.L	CX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.23%	-92.37%	+27.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.13%	-23.99%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.35%	-64.00%	+12.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.44%	-83.70%	+29.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.13%	-44.45%	+22.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-51.25%	+33.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.40%	6.25%	+0.15%

Volatility

SMSN.L vs. CX - Volatility Comparison

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 18.73% compared to CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) at 15.37%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMSN.L	CX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.73%	15.37%	+3.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.02%	27.45%	+7.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.69%	35.25%	+6.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.69%	40.09%	-8.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.33%	43.37%	-12.04%

Financials

SMSN.L vs. CX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SMSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.94T and revenue of 93.84T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.

CX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.

SMSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 20.08T and revenue of 93.84T, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

CX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 491.35M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

SMSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 20.24T and revenue of 93.84T, resulting in a net margin of 21.6%.

CX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of -355.93M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.