PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSN.L vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
37.27%130.81%-37.94%38.34%-31.32%-8.01%60.01%41.56%-25.35%63.26%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-23.28%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SMSN.L:

$764.25B

MSFT:

$2.76T

EPS

SMSN.L:

$169.44K

MSFT:

$15.98

PE Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.02

MSFT:

23.16

PEG Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

MSFT:

1.62

PS Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

MSFT:

9.04

PB Ratio

SMSN.L:

0.00

MSFT:

7.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$335.26T

MSFT:

$305.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$98.56T

MSFT:

$209.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

SMSN.L:

$27.90T

MSFT:

$191.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 37.27% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -23.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 20.58%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.44% annualized return.


SMSN.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-22.13%
YTD
37.27%
6M
89.83%
1Y
194.46%
3Y*
34.50%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
20.58%

MSFT

1D
3.12%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
-23.28%
6M
-28.23%
1Y
-0.64%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
22.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSN.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSN.L
SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMSN.LMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.65

-0.02

+4.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.56

0.15

+4.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.02

+0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.45

-0.05

+8.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.22

-0.12

+29.34

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.65, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSN.L and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMSN.LMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65

-0.02

+4.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.37

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.84

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.74

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between SMSN.L and MSFT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than MSFT's 0.94% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
0.45%0.94%2.88%1.79%2.50%1.85%3.60%2.47%3.65%1.62%1.68%1.71%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.94%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Drawdowns

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -65.23%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and MSFT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSN.LMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.23%

-69.38%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.13%

-33.91%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.35%

-37.15%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

-37.15%

-17.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.13%

-31.43%

+9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-21.77%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.40%

12.46%

-6.06%

Volatility

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 18.73% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 6.48%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMSN.LMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.73%

6.48%

+12.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.02%

19.15%

+15.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.69%

26.46%

+15.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.69%

26.19%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.33%

26.89%

+4.44%

Financials

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00T40.00T60.00T80.00T100.00TAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
93.84T
81.27B
(SMSN.L) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SMSN.L vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
47.9%
68.0%
Portfolio components
SMSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.94T and revenue of 93.84T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.30B and revenue of 81.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

SMSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 20.08T and revenue of 93.84T, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.28B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.

SMSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 20.24T and revenue of 93.84T, resulting in a net margin of 21.6%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 38.46B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in a net margin of 47.3%.