LRCU vs. GUSH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH).

LRCU and GUSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRCU is an actively managed fund by Tradr. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. GUSH is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). It was launched on Apr 1, 2020.

Performance

LRCU vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LRCU vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	48.62%	162.61%
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	87.03%	3.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 48.62% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 87.03% return.

LRCU

• 1D: 7.79%
• 1M: -12.02%
• YTD: 48.62%
• 6M: 97.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GUSH

• 1D: -7.69%
• 1M: 19.66%
• YTD: 87.03%
• 6M: 61.77%
• 1Y: 53.22%
• 3Y*: 12.65%
• 5Y*: 17.99%
• 10Y*: -32.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.

LRCU

Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF

GUSH

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH

GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 43
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRCU	GUSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	7.42	-0.43	+7.85

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and GUSH is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

LRCU vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	1.33%	2.60%	2.96%	3.00%	0.47%	0.00%	0.20%	1.68%	0.17%	0.00%	3.26%

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and GUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	GUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-99.98%	+59.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.64%	-99.77%	+73.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-92.81%	+82.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	GUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.26%	67.59%	+42.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	110.26%	68.73%	+41.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	110.26%	94.30%	+15.96%