LRCU vs. LITX
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
LRCU vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRCU
- 1D
- 10.24%
- 1M
- 70.04%
- YTD
- 354.34%
- 6M
- 335.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 9.82%
- 1M
- -17.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 176.70% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 304.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and LITX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum LITX drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -51.46% | +11.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.78% | +35.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -16.83% | +7.62% |
Volatility
LRCU vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.65% | 195.89% | -81.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.65% | 195.89% | -81.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.65% | 195.89% | -81.24% |
LRCU vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and LITX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRCU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRCU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
LRCU and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer