LQDA vs. CRDO
LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CRDO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LQDA returned 120.93%/yr vs 130.87%/yr for CRDO. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LQDA vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 143.87% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 43.85% return.
LQDA
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 98.42%
- YTD
- 143.87%
- 1Y
- 350.03%
- 3Y*
- 120.93%
- 5Y*
- 105.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.92%
CRDO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -20.11%
- 6M
- 65.22%
- YTD
- 43.85%
- 1Y
- 85.56%
- 3Y*
- 130.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 87.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.17B | $1.40B | $1.87B | |
| $129.21M | $115.99M | $136.40M |
LQDA vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 143.87% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 18.84% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 43.85% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDA and CRDO is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
LQDA:
$7.48B
CRDO:
$38.60B
LQDA:
$0.23
CRDO:
$2.50
LQDA:
361.38
CRDO:
82.94
LQDA:
27.98
CRDO:
29.34
LQDA:
78.33
CRDO:
19.33
LQDA:
$288.07M
CRDO:
$1.34B
LQDA:
$275.77M
CRDO:
$908.35M
LQDA:
$51.53M
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDA vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
LQDA
CRDO
LQDA vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQDA | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.20 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.89 | 1.61 | +8.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.71 | 3.65 | +22.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQDA vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDA | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.87% | -62.04% | -31.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.66% | -53.59% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.80% | -61.05% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -31.58% | +26.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.43% | -19.39% | -49.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.69% | 23.55% | -9.86% |
Volatility
LQDA vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) is 19.04%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 29.83%. This indicates that LQDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDA | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.04% | 29.83% | -10.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.97% | 73.09% | -24.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.53% | 92.00% | -25.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 82.43% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.46% | 82.43% | +3.03% |
Dividends
LQDA vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
Neither LQDA nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LQDA vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidia Corporation and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LQDA vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDA and CRDO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to LQDA (19.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.31 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDA and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer