LQD vs. IGLB
LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and IGLB (iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - LQD tracks the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index while IGLB tracks the ICE BofAML10+ Year US Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LQD returned 2.56%/yr vs 2.31%/yr for IGLB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LQD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IGLB.
Performance
LQD vs. IGLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than IGLB's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has outperformed IGLB with an annualized return of 2.56%, while IGLB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.31% annualized return.
LQD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
IGLB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
LQD vs. IGLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.67% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
IGLB iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 1.13% | 7.53% | -1.50% | 11.03% | -25.38% | -1.68% | 13.30% | 23.19% | -6.90% | 12.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQD and IGLB is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2009 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LQD and IGLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQD vs. IGLB — Risk / Return Rank
LQD
IGLB
LQD vs. IGLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQD | IGLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.34 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 3.37 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQD | IGLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.90 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | -0.13 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.19 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.38 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
LQD vs. IGLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum IGLB drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and IGLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQD | IGLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | -34.12% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | -5.19% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | -12.87% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.95% | -34.12% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.95% | -34.12% | +9.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -13.46% | +9.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -8.11% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 2.06% | -0.89% |
Volatility
LQD vs. IGLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 1.62%, while iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQD | IGLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 2.25% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.90% | 5.70% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.36% | 7.84% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.64% | 12.39% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.68% | 12.53% | -3.85% |
LQD vs. IGLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQD vs. IGLB - Dividend Comparison
LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than IGLB's 5.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLB iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.25% | 5.14% | 5.10% | 4.59% | 4.56% | 3.16% | 3.22% | 3.73% | 4.56% | 3.94% | 4.21% | 4.58% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.56% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LQD and IGLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IGLB has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to LQD (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQD dropped -24.95% vs IGLB's -34.12%.
On 10-year performance, LQD leads with 2.56% vs 2.31% for IGLB. On fees, IGLB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LQD has performed better with a 2.56% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGLB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LQD.
IGLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 4.56% for LQD.
LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index, while IGLB tracks ICE BofAML10+ Year US Corporate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQD and 0.06% for IGLB.
LQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQD and IGLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer