PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLB vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLB vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLB has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 2.20%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.75% annualized return.


IGLB

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.36%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.21%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
2.20%

TLT

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.06%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.41%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
-1.93%
5Y*
-6.59%
10Y*
-1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLB vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
1.19%7.53%-1.50%11.03%-25.38%-1.68%13.30%23.19%-6.90%12.15%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.64%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLB and TLT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009

0.82

The correlation between IGLB and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLB vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLB
IGLB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLB vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLBTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.54

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

1.29

+1.85

IGLB vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLB and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLB vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLB drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLB and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLBTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.12%

-48.35%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-7.58%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-19.18%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.12%

-43.70%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

-48.35%

+14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.41%

-39.89%

+26.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-13.87%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.17%

-1.07%

Volatility

IGLB vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) is 1.89%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that IGLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLBTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

2.21%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

6.63%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

9.50%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.38%

15.82%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.55%

14.91%

-2.36%

IGLB vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLB vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

IGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than TLT's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
5.24%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.55%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IGLB and TLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLT has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to IGLB (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLB dropped -34.12% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 10-year performance, IGLB leads with 2.20% vs -1.75% for TLT. On fees, IGLB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IGLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGLB has performed better with a 2.20% return vs -1.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

IGLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.55% for TLT.

IGLB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. IGLB tracks ICE BofAML10+ Year US Corporate Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IGLB and 0.15% for TLT.

IGLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLB and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer