LQD vs. ^GSPC
LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, LQD returned 2.53%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LQD vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 2.53%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.
LQD
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
LQD vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.88% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.02% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQD and ^GSPC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, LQD and ^GSPC have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQD vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
LQD
^GSPC
LQD vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQD | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.52 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 11.31 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQD vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQD | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | -56.78% | +31.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | -9.10% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | -18.90% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.95% | -25.43% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.95% | -33.92% | +8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -2.83% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -10.72% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 2.02% | -0.83% |
Volatility
LQD vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 1.77%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQD | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 4.44% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.04% | 9.71% | -5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.38% | 12.38% | -7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.65% | 16.97% | -8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 18.09% | -9.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQD and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^GSPC has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to LQD (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQD dropped -24.95% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQD and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer