LQAI vs. ROBO
LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. LQAI is actively managed, while ROBO is passively managed. Over the past year, LQAI returned 22.80% vs 28.77% for ROBO. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LQAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ROBO.
Performance
LQAI vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LQAI having a 14.28% return and ROBO slightly higher at 14.34%.
LQAI
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.41%
ROBO
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 28.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.07K | $10.19K | $17.32K | |
| $10.10M | $12.55M | $20.11M |
LQAI vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 14.28% | 13.70% | 27.82% | 9.29% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 14.34% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQAI and ROBO is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between LQAI and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
LQAI vs. ROBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LQAI
ROBO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LQAI
ROBO
Financial Services
LQAI
ROBO
Communication Services
LQAI
ROBO
Utilities
LQAI
ROBO
-
Consumer Defensive
LQAI
ROBO
Consumer Cyclical
LQAI
ROBO
Industrials
LQAI
ROBO
Healthcare
LQAI
ROBO
Energy
LQAI
ROBO
-
Real Estate
LQAI
ROBO
-
Basic Materials
LQAI
ROBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQAI vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank
LQAI
ROBO
LQAI vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQAI | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.60 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 4.75 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQAI vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum ROBO drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and ROBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQAI | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -43.65% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -17.35% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -12.28% | +4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -12.88% | +9.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 5.85% | -1.84% |
Volatility
LQAI vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is 6.78%, while ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that LQAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQAI | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 9.79% | -3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 22.47% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 26.46% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 24.41% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 23.47% | -5.66% |
LQAI vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQAI vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison
LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than ROBO's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 0.95% | 1.14% | 0.69% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.37% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQAI and ROBO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBO has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to LQAI (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQAI dropped -21.24% vs ROBO's -43.65%.
On 1-year performance, ROBO leads with 28.77% vs 22.80% for LQAI. On fees, LQAI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, LQAI has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 28.77% return vs 22.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQAI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
LQAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.37% for ROBO.
LQAI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ROBO is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQAI and 0.95% for ROBO.
LQAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQAI and ROBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer