LQAI vs. THLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LQAI is actively managed, while THLV is passively managed. Over the past year, LQAI returned 42.11% vs 18.29% for THLV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LQAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for THLV.

Performance

LQAI vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQAI achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly higher than THLV's 9.49% return.

LQAI

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 10.98%
• YTD: 22.12%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 42.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

THLV

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 12.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQAI vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	22.12%	13.70%	27.82%	9.12%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	9.49%	10.50%	9.52%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LQAI and THLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.70

The correlation between LQAI and THLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

LQAI vs. THLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LQAI	THLV
Technology	40.4%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.7%	15.7%
Communication Services	9.8%	0.1%
Financial Services	8.7%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	13.7%
Energy	6.6%	17.5%
Utilities	4.4%	14.7%
Healthcare	4.1%	12.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	14.3%
Industrials	1.1%	13.5%
Basic Materials	0.1%	12.2%

Return for Risk

LQAI vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQAI

LQAI Risk / Return Rank: 78
LQAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LQAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LQAI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LQAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LQAI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 54
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQAI vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQAI	THLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	1.87	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.65	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.33	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	2.76	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	8.38	+3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LQAI vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQAI and THLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQAI	THLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	1.87	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.88	+0.86

Drawdowns

LQAI vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and THLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQAI	THLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.24%	-13.15%	-8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-6.66%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-1.99%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-3.74%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	2.19%	+1.28%

Volatility

LQAI vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.45%. This indicates that LQAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQAI	THLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	3.45%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	7.48%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.43%	9.84%	+5.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	11.73%	+5.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	11.73%	+5.25%

LQAI vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQAI vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than THLV's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	0.89%	1.14%	0.69%	0.16%	0.00%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.62%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQAI and THLV in my portfolio?

LQAI and THLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LQAI or THLV?

LQAI has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to THLV (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQAI dropped -21.24% vs THLV's -13.15%.

Which ETF is better, LQAI or THLV?

On 1-year performance, LQAI leads with 42.11% vs 18.29% for THLV. On fees, THLV is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LQAI or THLV?

Over the 1-year period, LQAI has performed better with a 42.11% return vs 18.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQAI or THLV?

THLV is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQAI or THLV?

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.89% for LQAI.

What is the main difference between LQAI and THLV?

They also come from different issuers: QRAFT and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQAI and 0.64% for THLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.