LQAI vs. TRFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and TRFM (AAM Transformers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by QRAFT, while TRFM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross. LQAI is actively managed, while TRFM is passively managed. Over the past year, LQAI returned 42.11% vs 53.69% for TRFM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LQAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TRFM.

Performance

LQAI vs. TRFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQAI achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly lower than TRFM's 30.30% return.

LQAI

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 10.98%
• YTD: 22.12%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 42.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRFM

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 12.40%
• YTD: 30.30%
• 6M: 29.25%
• 1Y: 53.69%
• 3Y*: 31.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQAI vs. TRFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	22.12%	13.70%	27.82%	9.12%
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF	30.30%	25.76%	19.96%	18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LQAI and TRFM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.85

The correlation between LQAI and TRFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

LQAI vs. TRFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LQAI	TRFM
Technology	40.4%	53.3%
Consumer Cyclical	14.7%	17.7%
Communication Services	9.8%	12.3%
Financial Services	8.7%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	-
Energy	6.6%	3.5%
Utilities	4.4%	1.7%
Healthcare	4.1%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Industrials	1.1%	7.2%
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.2%

Return for Risk

LQAI vs. TRFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQAI

LQAI Risk / Return Rank: 78
LQAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LQAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LQAI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LQAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LQAI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

TRFM

TRFM Risk / Return Rank: 71
TRFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TRFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TRFM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
TRFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TRFM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQAI vs. TRFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQAI	TRFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	2.41	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.04	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.39	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	4.15	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	14.09	-1.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LQAI vs. TRFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the TRFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQAI and TRFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQAI	TRFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	2.41	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	1.05	+0.69

Drawdowns

LQAI vs. TRFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum TRFM drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and TRFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQAI	TRFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.24%	-28.40%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-12.99%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-1.23%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-6.61%	+3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.82%	-0.35%

Volatility

LQAI vs. TRFM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is 5.29%, while AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that LQAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQAI	TRFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	7.34%	-2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	17.46%	-6.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.43%	22.47%	-7.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	26.94%	-9.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	26.94%	-9.96%

LQAI vs. TRFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRFM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQAI vs. TRFM - Dividend Comparison

LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than TRFM's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	0.89%	1.14%	0.69%	0.16%
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF	0.13%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQAI and TRFM in my portfolio?

LQAI and TRFM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LQAI or TRFM?

TRFM has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to LQAI (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQAI dropped -21.24% vs TRFM's -28.40%.

Which ETF is better, LQAI or TRFM?

On 1-year performance, TRFM leads with 53.69% vs 42.11% for LQAI. On fees, TRFM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, LQAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LQAI or TRFM?

Over the 1-year period, TRFM has performed better with a 53.69% return vs 42.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQAI or TRFM?

TRFM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQAI or TRFM?

LQAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.13% for TRFM.

What is the main difference between LQAI and TRFM?

LQAI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TRFM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: QRAFT and AAM. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQAI and 0.49% for TRFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.