LPRO vs. SOYB
LPRO (Open Lending Corporation) is a stock, while SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. Over the past 5 years, LPRO returned -39.27%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for SOYB. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LPRO vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPRO achieves a 102.58% return, which is significantly higher than SOYB's 15.10% return.
LPRO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 75.42%
- YTD
- 102.58%
- 1Y
- 45.37%
- 3Y*
- -34.61%
- 5Y*
- -39.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.51%
SOYB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 18.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.51M | $5.67M | $7.99M | |
| $1.57M | $2.15M | $2.74M |
LPRO vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPRO Open Lending Corporation | 102.58% | -74.04% | -29.85% | 26.07% | -69.97% | -35.70% | 231.69% | 8.10% | 1.04% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 15.10% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | -2.16% | -16.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPRO and SOYB is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2018 | 0.04 |
The correlation between LPRO and SOYB shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPRO vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank
LPRO
SOYB
LPRO vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPRO | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 2.13 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 5.60 | -4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPRO vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPRO drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPRO and SOYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPRO | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.06% | -53.76% | -44.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -8.78% | -42.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.02% | -30.61% | -61.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.01% | -31.01% | -67.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.71% | -14.16% | -78.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -25.64% | -24.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.23% | 3.33% | +23.90% |
Volatility
LPRO vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is 1.48%, while Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that LPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPRO | SOYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 5.47% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.73% | 10.13% | +52.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.20% | 13.37% | +69.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.27% | 17.12% | +56.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.92% | 16.70% | +44.22% |
Dividends
LPRO vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison
Neither LPRO nor SOYB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LPRO and SOYB have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOYB has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to LPRO (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPRO dropped -98.06% vs SOYB's -53.76%.
SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPRO and SOYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer