PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOWIX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund (LOWIX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWIX achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 17.17% return.


LOWIX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.31%
YTD
8.15%
6M
8.14%
1Y
18.79%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
6.86%

BLNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
17.17%
6M
18.61%
1Y
31.77%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LOWIX
Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund
8.15%10.67%3.52%15.19%-16.11%12.55%11.57%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
17.17%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LOWIX and BLNDX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.62

The correlation between LOWIX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOWIX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOWIX
LOWIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LOWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund (LOWIX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOWIXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

6.52

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.92

20.94

-7.02

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWIX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOWIXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.44

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.83

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.06

-0.47

Drawdowns

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWIX drawdown since its inception was -23.37%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWIX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOWIXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.37%

-17.69%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.03%

-4.75%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-17.69%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

-17.69%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-3.19%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.50%

-0.11%

Volatility

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund (LOWIX) is 2.35%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that LOWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOWIXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.02%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

9.51%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.43%

12.72%

-4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

11.66%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

11.75%

+0.15%

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOWIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOWIX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

LOWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.63%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LOWIX
Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund
3.33%3.56%1.05%3.39%2.35%3.14%0.78%1.88%1.52%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOWIX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to LOWIX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWIX dropped -23.37% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOWIX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer