PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOWIX vs. LNOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund (LOWIX) and Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWIX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than LNOIX's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LOWIX has outperformed LNOIX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while LNOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.


LOWIX

1D
0.69%
1M
1.25%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.11%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
6.86%

LNOIX

1D
0.52%
1M
1.02%
YTD
5.33%
6M
4.87%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOWIX
Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund
7.88%10.67%3.52%15.19%-16.11%12.55%11.57%19.69%-7.27%13.21%
LNOIX
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund
5.33%9.40%1.50%11.87%-14.51%8.43%8.21%15.32%-5.05%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LOWIX and LNOIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.97

The correlation between LOWIX and LNOIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOWIX vs. LNOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOWIX
LOWIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LOWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LNOIX
LNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund (LOWIX) and Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOWIXLNOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.73

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

11.56

+1.30

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the LNOIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWIX and LNOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWIX drawdown since its inception was -23.37%, which is greater than LNOIX's maximum drawdown of -19.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWIX and LNOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOWIXLNOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.37%

-19.03%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.03%

-5.04%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-16.50%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

-19.03%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.37%

-19.03%

-4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.29%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-4.03%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.19%

+0.22%

Volatility

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Volatility Comparison

Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund (LOWIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) at 2.56%. This indicates that LOWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOWIXLNOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.56%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

5.48%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

6.76%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.09%

9.53%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.93%

8.98%

+2.95%

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOWIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than LNOIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOWIX vs. LNOIX - Dividend Comparison

LOWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than LNOIX's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNOIX
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund
3.49%3.65%1.65%1.80%2.60%1.76%1.06%1.91%1.67%1.94%
LOWIX
Ladenburg Growth & Income Fund
3.34%3.56%1.05%3.39%2.35%3.14%0.78%1.88%1.52%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LOWIX and LNOIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LOWIX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to LNOIX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWIX dropped -23.37% vs LNOIX's -19.03%.

LOWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOWIX and LNOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer