LOW vs. CWT
LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) and CWT (California Water Service Group) are both stocks. LOW operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CWT operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, LOW returned 11.83%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for CWT. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LOW vs. CWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOW achieves a -12.49% return, which is significantly lower than CWT's 17.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LOW has outperformed CWT with an annualized return of 11.83%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.
LOW
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -21.33%
- YTD
- -12.49%
- 1Y
- -5.14%
- 3Y*
- -1.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.80%
CWT
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 1.23%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.21M | $23.35M | $24.82M | |
| $697.98M | $655.53M | $672.08M |
LOW vs. CWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -12.49% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 63.34% | 36.40% | 32.23% | 1.22% | 33.29% |
CWT California Water Service Group | 17.43% | -1.81% | -10.64% | -12.83% | -14.13% | 35.05% | 6.68% | 9.85% | 7.06% | 36.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOW and CWT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
LOW:
$116.57B
CWT:
$3.00B
LOW:
$11.86
CWT:
$2.23
LOW:
17.52
CWT:
22.50
LOW:
19.14
CWT:
0.54
LOW:
1.32
CWT:
2.84
LOW:
$88.43B
CWT:
$1.05B
LOW:
$29.89B
CWT:
$196.22M
LOW:
$11.50B
CWT:
$346.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOW vs. CWT — Risk / Return Rank
LOW
CWT
LOW vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOW | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.11 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.92 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 1.74 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOW vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOW drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than CWT's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOW and CWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOW | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -38.21% | -24.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.97% | -14.59% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.97% | -24.13% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -38.21% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.63% | -38.21% | -10.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.89% | -22.88% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -11.75% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.23% | 7.70% | +7.53% |
Volatility
LOW vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to California Water Service Group (CWT) at 6.85%. This indicates that LOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOW | CWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 6.85% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.44% | 19.17% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.38% | 24.72% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 24.33% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 27.72% | +1.62% |
Dividends
LOW vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison
LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than CWT's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWT California Water Service Group | 2.53% | 2.86% | 2.47% | 2.01% | 1.65% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 1.53% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 2.04% | 2.88% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.33% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
Financials
LOW vs. CWT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lowe's Companies, Inc. and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOW vs. CWT - Profitability Comparison
LOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.54B and revenue of 23.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
CWT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of -63.68M and revenue of 308.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -20.6%.
LOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
CWT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 70.83M and revenue of 308.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
LOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
CWT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 56.47M and revenue of 308.60M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOW and CWT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOW has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to CWT (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOW dropped -62.52% vs CWT's -38.21%.
CWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOW and CWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer