LONGX vs. NLSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LONGX (Longboard Alternative Growth Fund) and NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, LONGX returned 24.86%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for NLSIX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LONGX charges 1.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for NLSIX.

Performance

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONGX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's 2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LONGX has outperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 24.86%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.

LONGX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 11.18%
• 5Y*: 4.47%
• 10Y*: 24.86%

NLSIX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund	9.61%	1.49%	14.95%	5.64%	-13.21%	13.89%	27.70%	13.82%	270.32%	19.08%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	2.34%	7.20%	7.47%	13.10%	-6.85%	9.01%	15.27%	17.11%	-6.92%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LONGX and NLSIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2015	0.56

The correlation between LONGX and NLSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LONGX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONGX

LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

NLSIX

NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LONGX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.26	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.86	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	1.41	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.73	5.44	+2.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONGX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LONGX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.26	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.86	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.94	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.96	-0.79

Drawdowns

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and NLSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LONGX	NLSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.16%	-14.75%	-62.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-4.39%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.57%	-6.90%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.28%	-10.79%	-8.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.16%	-14.75%	-62.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.58%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.37%	-2.02%	-5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	1.13%	+0.71%

Volatility

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.42%. This indicates that LONGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LONGX	NLSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	1.42%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	3.93%	+4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.61%	4.91%	+5.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.88%	6.66%	+5.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	137.76%	7.32%	+130.44%

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

LONGX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.40%	7.64%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	3.10%	268.50%	23.29%	0.00%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.02%	0.97%	7.01%	1.13%	2.15%	2.39%	5.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LONGX and NLSIX in my portfolio?

LONGX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LONGX or NLSIX?

LONGX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to NLSIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LONGX dropped -77.16% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LONGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.