PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LONGX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LONGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONGX achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LONGX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 24.95%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.


LONGX

1D
0.71%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.88%
6M
11.10%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
24.95%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LONGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
12.88%1.49%14.95%5.64%-13.21%13.89%27.70%13.82%270.32%19.08%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LONGX and VOO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2015

0.66

The correlation between LONGX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LONGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONGX
LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LONGXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.67

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

11.96

-2.25

LONGX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONGX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LONGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LONGXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.16%

-33.99%

-43.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-8.90%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

-18.69%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-24.52%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.16%

-33.99%

-43.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.14%

+3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-3.68%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.99%

-0.15%

Volatility

LONGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) is 3.21%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that LONGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LONGXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.83%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

9.82%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

12.46%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

16.91%

-5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.79%

18.02%

+119.77%

LONGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LONGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.40%7.64%1.73%0.00%0.00%3.10%268.50%23.29%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LONGX and VOO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to LONGX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LONGX dropped -77.16% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LONGX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer