LONGX vs. QMHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX).
LONGX is managed by Longboard. It was launched on Mar 15, 2015. QMHIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 15, 2013.
Performance
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund | 0.33% | 1.49% | 14.95% | 5.64% | -13.21% | 13.89% | 27.70% | 13.82% | 270.32% | 19.08% |
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund | 14.62% | 19.97% | 10.78% | -0.17% | 50.14% | -2.08% | -0.73% | 1.82% | -14.44% | -1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LONGX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than QMHIX's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LONGX has outperformed QMHIX with an annualized return of 23.63%, while QMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.02% annualized return.
LONGX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 23.63%
QMHIX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QMHIX's 1.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LONGX vs. QMHIX — Risk / Return Rank
LONGX
QMHIX
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LONGX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 2.01 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 2.45 | -1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 3.29 | -2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 8.79 | -7.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LONGX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.01 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.96 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.33 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between LONGX and QMHIX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Dividend Comparison
LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.40% | 7.64% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.10% | 268.50% | 23.29% | 0.00% |
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund | 1.79% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 7.66% | 9.34% | 10.96% | 9.52% | 4.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than QMHIX's maximum drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and QMHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LONGX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.16% | -39.37% | -37.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -8.34% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.28% | -19.06% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.16% | -34.54% | -42.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.53% | -0.62% | -5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -18.05% | +10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 3.13% | -0.87% |
Volatility
LONGX vs. QMHIX - Volatility Comparison
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) have volatilities of 4.15% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LONGX | QMHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.98% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 9.98% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 14.16% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 17.26% | -5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.75% | 15.50% | +122.25% |