LOHA vs. VTI
LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LOHA tracks the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
LOHA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOHA
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
LOHA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | -0.44% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOHA and VTI is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOHA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
LOHA
VTI
LOHA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOHA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 0.50 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
LOHA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOHA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -55.45% | +53.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.93% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -8.02% | +7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
LOHA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOHA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 12.48% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 17.44% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 18.32% | -6.48% |
LOHA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOHA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOHA and VTI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for LOHA.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.
LOHA tracks Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.03% for VTI.
Find the right allocation for LOHA and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer