LOHA vs. MAGY
LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOHA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. LOHA is passively managed, while MAGY is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGY.
Performance
LOHA vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOHA
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY
- 1D
- -3.74%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -4.07%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOHA vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | -0.44% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOHA and MAGY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOHA vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank
LOHA
MAGY
LOHA vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOHA | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 1.28 | -1.91 |
Drawdowns
LOHA vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum MAGY drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and MAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOHA | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -14.29% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -6.16% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -2.71% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility
LOHA vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOHA | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 14.91% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 15.00% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 15.00% | -3.16% |
LOHA vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOHA vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison
LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 39.03% | 23.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOHA and MAGY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 39.03%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.
LOHA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.99% for MAGY.
Find the right allocation for LOHA and MAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer