PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOAN vs. REFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOAN vs. REFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOAN achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly lower than REFI's -2.68% return.


LOAN

1D
0.23%
1M
3.79%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-7.54%
1Y
-8.33%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
7.47%

REFI

1D
3.06%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-4.63%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOAN vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
-3.60%-9.37%22.47%2.12%5.67%-2.24%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-2.68%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LOAN and REFI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOAN:

$50.07M

REFI:

$245.99M

EPS

LOAN:

$0.44

REFI:

$226.63

PE Ratio

LOAN:

9.99

REFI:

0.05

PEG Ratio

LOAN:

5.17

REFI:

0.00

PS Ratio

LOAN:

5.91

REFI:

5.54

PB Ratio

LOAN:

1.16

REFI:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOAN:

$8.47M

REFI:

$44.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOAN:

$6.80M

REFI:

$42.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

LOAN:

$5.02M

REFI:

$8.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOAN vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOAN
LOAN Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LOAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LOAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOAN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOAN vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOANREFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.97

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

-0.46

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

-0.82

+0.23

LOAN vs. REFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the REFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOAN and REFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOAN vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and REFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOANREFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-26.55%

-64.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-14.71%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-19.25%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.77%

-15.63%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.41%

-9.93%

-36.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.15%

8.28%

+5.87%

Volatility

LOAN vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) is 4.21%, while Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that LOAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOANREFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

6.25%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.94%

16.18%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.68%

23.78%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.12%

24.32%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.41%

24.32%

+10.09%

Dividends

LOAN vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison

LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, less than REFI's 16.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
10.39%9.89%8.21%9.05%9.38%8.82%8.06%7.55%8.54%6.97%4.93%9.68%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.42%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LOAN vs. REFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20222023202420252026
2.07M
0
(LOAN) Total Revenue
(REFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LOAN and REFI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REFI has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to LOAN (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs REFI's -26.55%.

REFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOAN and REFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer