CCRN vs. BXC
CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) and BXC (BlueLinx Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. CCRN operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while BXC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CCRN returned -0.27%/yr vs 22.66%/yr for BXC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCRN vs. BXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCRN achieves a 62.59% return, which is significantly higher than BXC's -9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRN has underperformed BXC with an annualized return of -0.27%, while BXC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.66% annualized return.
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- 1Y
- -6.13%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
BXC
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- 13.65%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -8.79%
- 1Y
- -19.23%
- 3Y*
- -14.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 22.66%
CCRN vs. BXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 62.59% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -42.55% | -18.26% |
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | -9.62% | -39.87% | -9.84% | 59.34% | -25.74% | 227.27% | 105.33% | -42.33% | 153.18% | 30.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRN and BXC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2004 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CCRN and BXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCRN:
-$3.06
BXC:
-$0.68
CCRN:
0.56
BXC:
0.11
CCRN:
$760.89M
BXC:
$2.98B
CCRN:
$138.12M
BXC:
$447.15M
CCRN:
$9.42M
BXC:
$79.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRN vs. BXC — Risk / Return Rank
CCRN
BXC
CCRN vs. BXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) and BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRN | BXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.99 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.41 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | -0.72 | +0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRN vs. BXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCRN drawdown since its inception was -90.04%, smaller than the maximum BXC drawdown of -97.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRN and BXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRN | BXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.04% | -97.46% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.08% | -47.62% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.43% | -65.56% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.24% | -65.56% | -14.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.24% | -91.71% | +11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.11% | -57.89% | -8.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.46% | -65.96% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.26% | 26.62% | -1.36% |
Volatility
CCRN vs. BXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) is 0.84%, while BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that CCRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRN | BXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 13.73% | -12.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 47.30% | -13.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.58% | 59.36% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.02% | 56.22% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.88% | 70.27% | -13.39% |
Dividends
CCRN vs. BXC - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCRN nor BXC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CCRN vs. BXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and BlueLinx Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRN and BXC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXC has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to CCRN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRN dropped -90.04% vs BXC's -97.46%.
CCRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCRN and BXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer