CCRN vs. OSUR
CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) and OSUR (OraSure Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — CCRN in Medical Care Facilities, OSUR in Medical Instruments & Supplies. Over the past 10 years, CCRN returned -0.27%/yr vs -4.53%/yr for OSUR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCRN vs. OSUR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCRN achieves a 62.59% return, which is significantly lower than OSUR's 71.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRN has outperformed OSUR with an annualized return of -0.27%, while OSUR has yielded a comparatively lower -4.53% annualized return.
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- 1Y
- -6.13%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
OSUR
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 15.24%
- YTD
- 71.90%
- 6M
- 72.61%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- -6.63%
- 5Y*
- -15.45%
- 10Y*
- -4.53%
CCRN vs. OSUR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 62.59% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -42.55% | -18.26% |
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 71.90% | -32.96% | -55.98% | 70.12% | -44.53% | -17.90% | 31.82% | -31.25% | -38.07% | 114.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRN and OSUR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2001 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CCRN and OSUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCRN:
$414.46M
OSUR:
$289.85M
CCRN:
-$3.06
OSUR:
-$0.73
CCRN:
0.56
OSUR:
3.53
CCRN:
$760.89M
OSUR:
$85.12M
CCRN:
$138.12M
OSUR:
$33.04M
CCRN:
$9.42M
OSUR:
-$47.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRN vs. OSUR — Risk / Return Rank
CCRN
OSUR
CCRN vs. OSUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) and OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRN | OSUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 0.99 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 2.22 | -2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRN vs. OSUR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCRN drawdown since its inception was -90.04%, roughly equal to the maximum OSUR drawdown of -90.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRN and OSUR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRN | OSUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.04% | -90.75% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.08% | -39.37% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.43% | -74.73% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.24% | -84.23% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.24% | -90.75% | +10.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.11% | -81.76% | +15.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.46% | -56.72% | -7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.26% | 17.46% | +7.80% |
Volatility
CCRN vs. OSUR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) is 0.84%, while OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) has a volatility of 20.12%. This indicates that CCRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OSUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRN | OSUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 20.12% | -19.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 34.50% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.58% | 48.62% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.02% | 54.97% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.88% | 56.94% | -0.06% |
Dividends
CCRN vs. OSUR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCRN nor OSUR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CCRN vs. OSUR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. and OraSure Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRN and OSUR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSUR has higher volatility (20.12%) compared to CCRN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRN dropped -90.04% vs OSUR's -90.75%.
OSUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCRN and OSUR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer