PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNGX vs. PWRZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LNGX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.09%
6M
17.84%
YTD
16.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PWRZ

1D
-0.93%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and PWRZ is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -1.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and PWRZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGXPWRZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-1.21%

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.31%

-1.21%

-13.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-0.42%

-5.69%

Volatility

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGXPWRZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.83%

12.75%

+12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.83%

12.75%

+12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

12.75%

+12.08%

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LNGX vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNGX and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

LNGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.75% for PWRZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNGX and PWRZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer