PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNGX vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNGX vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 37.56% return.


LNGX

1D
1.66%
1M
4.78%
6M
18.75%
YTD
18.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
1.39%
1M
-12.40%
6M
24.59%
YTD
37.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and POW is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNGX vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LNGX vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGXPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-20.28%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.89%

-19.18%

+6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-4.64%

-1.51%

Volatility

LNGX vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGXPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.83%

33.00%

-8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.83%

33.00%

-8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

33.00%

-8.17%

LNGX vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LNGX vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNGX and POW have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

LNGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNGX and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer