LNG vs. SHELL.AS
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and SHELL.AS (Shell plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — LNG in Oil & Gas Midstream, SHELL.AS in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 22.78%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for SHELL.AS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LNG is traded in USD, while SHELL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SHELL.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than SHELL.AS's 18.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed SHELL.AS with an annualized return of 22.78%, while SHELL.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
SHELL.AS
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 25.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
SHELL.AS Shell plc | 18.92% | 23.33% | -1.07% | 21.18% | 33.55% | 34.10% | -39.16% | 5.39% | -5.67% | 25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and SHELL.AS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007 | 0.25 |
The correlation between LNG and SHELL.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. SHELL.AS — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
SHELL.AS
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Shell plc (SHELL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | SHELL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 2.30 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 6.01 | -5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than SHELL.AS's maximum drawdown of -67.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and SHELL.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | SHELL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -67.99% | -29.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -10.88% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -20.43% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -25.10% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | -67.99% | +10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -8.19% | -10.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -17.95% | -25.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.88% | 4.19% | +7.69% |
Volatility
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Shell plc (SHELL.AS) at 6.75%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHELL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | SHELL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 6.75% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 18.10% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.02% | 21.28% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 25.80% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 30.64% | +1.86% |
Dividends
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than SHELL.AS's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHELL.AS Shell plc | 3.39% | 3.94% | 4.44% | 4.15% | 3.74% | 4.24% | 6.12% | 6.73% | 7.13% | 6.51% | 6.14% | 6.92% |
Financials
LNG vs. SHELL.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and SHELL.AS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LNG and SHELL.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer