LNG vs. INTL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while INTL (Main International ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Main Funds. Over the past 3 years, LNG returned 18.48%/yr vs 17.19%/yr for INTL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LNG vs. INTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Main International ETF (INTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 21.68% return, which is significantly higher than INTL's 11.21% return.

LNG

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -13.54%
• YTD: 21.68%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: -2.72%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 23.09%
• 10Y*: 22.16%

INTL

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 11.21%
• 6M: 13.45%
• 1Y: 27.41%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. INTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	21.68%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	-14.17%
INTL Main International ETF	11.21%	29.55%	2.00%	18.20%	-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and INTL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2022	0.13

The correlation between LNG and INTL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LNG vs. INTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 34
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

INTL

INTL Risk / Return Rank: 52
INTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
INTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
INTL Omega Ratio Rank: 53
INTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
INTL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. INTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Main International ETF (INTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LNG	INTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.79	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	2.50	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.33	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	2.39	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	9.45	-9.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LNG vs. INTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the INTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and INTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNG	INTL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	1.79	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	1.05	-0.89

Drawdowns

LNG vs. INTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than INTL's maximum drawdown of -14.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and INTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNG	INTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.84%	-14.48%	-83.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.09%	-11.51%	-12.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.87%	-14.48%	-10.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.54%	-1.27%	-19.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.17%	-2.88%	-40.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.50%	2.91%	+8.59%

Volatility

LNG vs. INTL - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Main International ETF (INTL) at 5.45%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNG	INTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	5.45%	+4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.72%	13.08%	+8.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.62%	15.35%	+12.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.27%	15.50%	+14.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.66%	15.50%	+17.16%

Dividends

LNG vs. INTL - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than INTL's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INTL Main International ETF	2.31%	2.57%	2.71%	2.86%	1.41%	0.00%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.92%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNG and INTL in my portfolio?

LNG and INTL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LNG or INTL?

LNG has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to INTL (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs INTL's -14.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.