INTL vs. VXUS
INTL (Main International ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Main Funds, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. INTL is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INTL returned 17.69%/yr vs 19.70%/yr for VXUS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. INTL charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
INTL vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 15.39% return.
INTL
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
INTL vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTL Main International ETF | 12.65% | 29.55% | 2.00% | 18.20% | -2.66% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 15.39% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTL and VXUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between INTL and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
INTL vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTL
VXUS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INTL
VXUS
Technology
INTL
VXUS
Industrials
INTL
VXUS
Basic Materials
INTL
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
INTL
VXUS
Healthcare
INTL
VXUS
Energy
INTL
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
INTL
VXUS
Communication Services
INTL
VXUS
Utilities
INTL
VXUS
Real Estate
INTL
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTL vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
INTL
VXUS
INTL vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.16 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.96 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.02 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 11.82 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.16 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.39 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
INTL vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.48% | -35.97% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -11.27% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -13.58% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -8.22% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.88% | +0.03% |
Volatility
INTL vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 5.57% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.01% | 12.97% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 15.19% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 16.04% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 17.16% | -1.66% |
INTL vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTL vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than VXUS's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTL Main International ETF | 2.28% | 2.57% | 2.71% | 2.86% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.63% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, INTL and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to INTL (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTL dropped -14.48% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 3-year performance, VXUS leads with 19.70% vs 17.69% for INTL. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, INTL has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 19.70% return vs 17.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for INTL.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.28% for INTL.
INTL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTL and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer